Monthly Archives: May 2016

Rescue Europe from Brussels

We’ve got the American elections on 8th November this year, the French presidential elections in April and May next year, followed by the German federal elections between August and October. The UK elections aren’t until 2020, if there isn’t a revolt beforehand!

Talking of revolt, can you imagine what the reactions would be if the electorate at each of these events were told by their political leaders: “OK you can vote for me and stay here OR you can vote against me and get out.”

The sense of outrage would be overwhelming and rightly so. Why the hell should we have to leave the country because we don’t like the way they are running things? After all it is us who are paying for it . . . including their salaries and considerable expenses. For this commitment from us we are singularly entitled to a say in how things are run and what sort of future we are looking for.

When accountability is ignored we have demonstrable proof of abuse of power, brought about by a whittling down of the democratic process.

We acknowledge this human fallibility with power in some parts of the world. In countries like the US and France, there is a constitutional limitation of just two terms on how long any one president can serve, no matter how popular or unpopular that person may be.  This statute of limitations is a reassurance against the abuse of power.

In the UK, who doesn’t have this limitation, we have seen a ‘natural’ break, where the incumbent just runs out of credibility because of abuse of power – as was the case with Margaret Thatcher (three terms), Tony Blair (2 ½ terms) and Cameron (who knows he won’t make a third term).

With only a very few exceptions, political parties/leaders seem to have an ‘inbuilt lifespan’ over which they can exercise power before the people grow weary of them and demand change. Perhaps it should be legislated for, although abuse of power is now rampant whatever the supposed safeguards.

So, given that brief resume of Democracy, why is it the British people are taking part in an ‘election’, to ratify the power of the officials running the EU, under the guise of a ‘Referendum’?

Referendum: Submission of an issue of public importance to the direct vote of the electorate. (The Free Dictionary by Farlex)

‘Vote’ is the operative word here and signifies support, or not, for those running the establishment, however that is structured. We support a party’s manifesto, in an election, with our vote and that is now what is being asked with this Referendum . . . but does it have the same credibility?!

Consider the facts.

  1. An election ‘Referendum’ has been called because there is unrest, now evidenced across Europe and a vote of confidence is therefore sought by those running things (Brussels).
  2. There are no alternative parties to vote for, so the only option is Brussels.
  3. There is no limitation on the length of service for the body that actually runs it all – The European Commission – so an ‘In’ vote has them running things for eternity.
  4. The members of this council form no part of the democratic process by which this election ’Referendum’ has been called, because they have not been elected by the very people now being asked to give them a vote of confidence. Nor do they have a manifesto which gives them some credibility . . . they are essentially seeking unconditional support.

Is it me or is this ‘Democracy for beginners’?

How can we possibly give a vote of confidence to a body, who won’t tell us what they are up to (TTIP), we had no hand in putting into power and cannot throw out either? That is why we are being forced to vote on a ‘Referendum’ and not in an Election . . . because there are no alternatives to Brussels . . . We have no choice!

Brussels must be having a good laugh, because a lot of people are taking this all very seriously. To be fair, it is incredibly serious in highlighting just how distorted our Democracy has become in the running of the European Union.

Political distortions seem to be Brussels forte, if we look at its track record, which has been one of constant regulation. Indeed, it latest efforts beggar belief when countries like Spain and Italy are about to be fined for not getting their GDP in order. Forget that they are struggling with the distorted financial (ECB) policies of Brussels in the first place.

Greece (the biggest distortion of the lot), is being regulated out of existence through debt that should have kept it from membership in the first place.

Then we have six countries who were recently hauled over the coals for not implementing Brussels induced legislation, that forced ‘bail ins’ of the banks (by their customers) to protect the banks when the next financial collapse occurs.

Here’s the distortion. With regulation also their forte, why has there been a deafening silence from Brussels on responsible regulation of those same banks to minimise a collapse from happening again? Perhaps they are now setting up the patsy’s instruments to pay for it all, because they know it will happen again.

Brussels regimentation of its 28 member countries, by endless biased rules and bureaucratic gobbledegook, seems the best it can come up with to ‘manage’ this European Union but is not working. In over 60 years it has built little that is having a positive effect upon unification.

Quite the reverse. This regimentation has now become so acute that Europe is breaking down because of gross mismanagement and a dwindling democracy, as people become demotivated through lack of involvement – whilst still having to pay for it all.

Europe could be a wondrous place, unified in a common sense of purpose, with a properly functioning democracy. Instead it is a political and corporate playing field, where the only injuries are experienced by the spectators, the 99%. This includes long term youth unemployment and immigration, whilst the rich and powerful play havoc with the essential myriad of values that hold Society in place to enrich their own pockets.

Europe needs rescuing from the clutches of the Neoliberal machinery that is currently Brussels. ‘Remaining’ to sort out the mess won’t work because Brussels (boosted by ‘Remain’) won’t give up its power, aided and abetted by the financiers who exert overall control, as they have done since inauguration.

Breaking that power is the only solution and if Britain doesn’t rescue Europe on 23rd June another country will, as the current model is unsustainable.

Until the next time

 

Thinking from his Book: Global Magna Carta. Returning Power to the 99% . . . If They Want It! By J T Coombes

Brussels Bans Referendums!

Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

— John F. Kennedy

Whilst this is not currently fact, what is now going on in Britain until 23rd June has so frightened Brussels and their financial lords and masters that, empowered by a vote to ‘Remain’, they will seek to make the banning of Referendums a reality.

This is not scaremongering but simply based on the evidence presented to us within this whole manipulative Referendum process. Stick with me for a minute and I will quickly make a case I think you will find it hard to refute.

All of the arguments and threats put so far, for remaining, have revolved around financial and business considerations and the damage ‘Exit’ could inflict upon trade.

Let’s be honest, have you seen or heard from your MEP, OR ANY MEP, (as our elected representatives), about the merits and demerits of the EU and their case for voting either way. No, neither have I and I am on between 2 and 300 newsletters!

If you accept for a moment that business and trade are the single most important issues surrounding this Referendum, as far as Brussels in concerned, then it is a forgone conclusion that if we vote to ‘Remain’, TTIP will immediately be implemented to support those interests.

We know from the recent leaks that within this odious trade agreement is the ability for corporations to sue governments if any of their legislation affects profits.

Ipso facto, if a Referendum is seen as being threatening to business interests, as we are told this one is, then Brussels will have no alternative, under the terms of the trade agreement, than to ban them. QED! (Don’t forget Greece where, because it was such a small player, the Troika simply ignored their Referendum on ‘Austerity’!)

Yes, it will be bound up in all sorts of political and diplomatic jargon like, “Greater unification of Europe cannot be achieved with issues that only reflect national interests against the general consensus of unity”. The bottom line however, will be to rid the system of any risk to the achievement of the current, corporate dominated, Neoliberal agenda to govern Europe.

What makes me even more certain of this course of action is how quiet Brussels has become over the TTIP leaks. No words of comfort, such as “In the light of public concern we will return to these negotiations at a later date”.

Everything has gone VERY quiet. In fact, Brussels seems to have shut down as we approach the 23rd June, with only good news about the cutting of phone tariffs (and God knows how much that will cost us in tax subsidies to the phone companies).

Talking of quiet, let’s go back to our MEP’s – the silence here is deafening! As I see it and correct me if I am alone here but this Referendum is about voting, one way or the other. We had a similar process earlier this year, with our local elections and you couldn’t move for elected and potential candidates vying for our vote.

According to The Telegraph each MEP costs three times as much as our Westminster MP’s, at a staggering price tag of £1.79 million . . . EACH YEAR! We pay for them to represent us and yet when it comes to getting something back for our money they are nowhere to be seen.

As our elected representatives, they are the (expensive) conduit between the people and the lawmakers in Brussels. Here again they remain silent, because they have no effective power to institute legislation, amend legislation or take legislation off the books. Forgive me but isn’t legislation the nuts and bolts of democracy and the effective management tool of the needs of Society?

As an integral part of the democratic process they are not only horrendously expensive but also totally ineffective. I would go further and call it a democratic ‘crime’, as various polls tell us between 12% and 13% of people are undecided because the lack sufficient information (that’s approximately 5 ½ million people), a shocking indictment of disservice by our MEP’s in their commitment to liaise, advise and inform.

Their silence, one can only assume, is because the ‘fix’ is in and they have been told to leave the arguments up to the big boys, like the IMF, Bank of England and US President, none of whom have been elected by any of us!

The best we can expect from our elected officials is a dubious leaflet from our even more dubious Prime Minister, (costing taxpayers £9 million) and 73 UK MEP’s, costing us a total of £130.67 million, who have been told to keep their mouths shut.

What the hell Boris and Gove are doing in the argument is beyond me. One is a ‘chancer’ and the other is a failed ‘reformer’. As far as Jeremy Corbyn is concerned, whilst being the most honest out of all of them in Westminster, his lack of enthusiasm for ‘Remain’ and a belief he can negotiate with Brussels does not inspire me.

Brussels are a sniff away from absolute power over Europe and once they have it dynamite won’t shift them.

If anything makes my blood boil it is this flagrant waste of our hard earned tax money on their pursuit of a Neoliberal Europe, where all that awaits us is debt, unemployment and little or no public services to support Society.

Instead the money we previously paid for those services will go into the corporate coffers of privatised services, as well as coming in handy to fund escalating sovereign debt, which lines the pockets of already obscenely wealthy bankers and which has cost them nothing to implement.

We are being taken for a ride of monumental proportions my friends and I weep at the abuse of the trust we have placed in a wholly corrupt system that is Brussels.

Our entitlement to fight for our rights is absolute, because we pay for it all in the first place and because we deserve so much better than our intended return to feudalism.

Until the next time.

 

Thinking from his Book: Global Magna Carta. Returning Power to the 99% . . . If They Want It! By J T Coombes